Update (2013-04-03): The energy regulator Ofgem has fined SSE a record £10.5m for mis-selling.
The UK's 'Big Six' energy suppliers have a reputation for poor customer service, unjustified price increases, and questionable sales tactics. In this post, I'm going to accuse a Southern Electric salesperson of attempted fraud. It's a serious allegation, but as I describe the events I think you'll agree they meet the legal definition. [1]
The UK's 'Big Six' energy suppliers have a reputation for poor customer service, unjustified price increases, and questionable sales tactics. In this post, I'm going to accuse a Southern Electric salesperson of attempted fraud. It's a serious allegation, but as I describe the events I think you'll agree they meet the legal definition. [1]
Firstly,
a little history: All properties on our development started with E.ON
as their gas and electricity supplier. For the first year after we
moved in, representatives of rival suppliers would make door-to-door
visits almost every week. As E.ON seemed in no rush to bill us, I put
off looking into the prices of rival companies. Seven months after we
moved in, a Southern Electric salesperson came by and showed a
print-out of their prices and those of their rivals, explaining that
we would pay less with them. I agreed to switch.
Shortly
afterwards, E.ON sent their only bill for the seven months we had
been with them. It was 60% higher than it should have been, but a
month later they refunded the overpayment, blaming Southern Electric
for the confusion. By this time I wasn't feeling sympathetic to E.ON
though – after we switched, an E.ON representative came by claiming
that Southern Electric were tricking people into switching, but his
aggressive tone meant I shut the door on him.
He
might have been right though – a couple of years later Scottish and Southern Energy (Southern Electric's parent company) were found guilty under The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008. Their doorstep salespeople had falsely claimed that they were
cheaper than people's current suppliers.
I
decided it was time to switch to a green energy tariff, and after
using a price comparison site I settled on EDF Green. Although I was
sceptical of the Big Six's commitment to renewable energy, EDF's
Green Tariff charged a small premium that went into a fund that
awarded grants to renewable energy projects. Even with this premium,
they were significantly cheaper than Southern Electric.
Finally,
at the end of last year I decided to switch to a true renewable
energy supplier: Good Energy. I'll write a little more about Good
Energy, and why I chose them over Ecotricity, in a future post.
This
brings us to the morning of 7th February, when Clare was
woken by a phone call. The caller explained that he was calling from
Southern Electric to set up the direct debit to complete the process
of moving our account. Clare was confused by this, and said I would
call them back when I was home from work. To me it sounded much like
the social engineering tricks I frequently encounter as a web
developer, most likely conducted by an unrelated third-party, so I
decided to ignore it. Two days later the following contract arrived
from Southern Electric, showing the call had been genuine:
The
letter was addressed to me, and the contract claims I had verbally
agreed to switch on the 8th February. At this point I had
had no contact with Southern
Electric since leaving them in 2011. It is this claim that leads me
to allege attempted fraud. (Two minor points to note: the contract
has the box allowing them to send me spam already marked, and their
standing charge is almost double what I pay with Good Energy.)
I
called the Southern Electric helpline, and after ten minutes in a
queue I was able to speak to someone. She was very polite and
apologetic, and after a further ten minutes, much of which was spent
on hold, the transfer had been cancelled. She explained that the
salesman who called us would be informed of his 'misunderstanding' to
avoid it happening again.
So,
everything's fine then? The transfer was cancelled, and all it cost
us was time and inconvenience. But how many times has that salesman
'misunderstood' his victims? Were we unlucky enough to be called by
the only salesperson using this trick? We're a security-conscious
young couple, but what if this had happened to a vulnerable
pensioner, living alone, worried about whether they can afford to
heat their house over the winter?
[1]
Specifically fraud by false
representation, an offence under section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006.
No comments:
Post a Comment